Lecture 3.0.0. SOC Interpretation of the 4-Year Scorecard
Besides being comprehensive, the SOC 4-year Scorecard is also very SIMPLE to use. The answer to each investigative question is either Yes or No. A “Yes” carries a score of 1 while a “No” carries a score of 0.
At the end, you sum up the scores, and the interpretation of the potential productivity of the crypto investment is based on this total score as follows:
Total Score of 1 to 3: Bad Investment
Total Score of 4 to 6: Cautious Investment
Total Score of 7 to 9: Good Investment
Total Score of 10 to 12: Very Good Investment
Total Score of 13 to 15: Awesome Investment
In other words, based on the SOC 4-year Scorecard, there are five types of outcomes in crypto investment: bad, cautious, good, very good, and awesome investment. A bad investment is one you shouldn’t enter into while for a cautious investment, you have to really weigh the risks.
Generally, it is very difficult to see an awesome investment. But if you search diligently, you can get one. If you see an awesome investment, rush in with your whole heart and reap the awesome profits.